Home / Publications / Research Report Series / Research Report 37 - Influence of GBR Zoning Plan (1)
Tools Print Page Larger Text Smaller Text

The influence of zoning (closure to fishing) on fish communities of the deep shoals and reef bases of the southern Great Barrier Reef

Part 1 - Baited video surveys of the Pompey, Swain and Capricorn-Bunker groups of reefs off Mackay and Gladstone

Research Report

Mike Cappo, Aaron MacNeil, Marcus Stowar and Peter Doherty

Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville

ISBN 9781921359361
Published October 2009

MTSRF Project 4.8.2 - Influence of the GBR Zoning Plan on inshore habitats and biodiversity, of which fish and corals are indicators:  Reefs and shoals

Executive Summary

This report presents the results of a single survey (Summer 2009) of sixteen pairs of large, discrete, deepwater reef bases in the southern Great Barrier Reef. Within each pair, one reef was zoned 'green' (closed to fishing) and the other 'blue' (open to all fishing).

The demersal habitats and vertebrate communities were sampled using non-extractive baited remote underwater video stations (BRUVS), which revealed a diverse (~360 species) fauna of fish, sharks, rays and sea snakes. This fauna included species prized by fishers, taken as bycatch, or not vulnerable to hook and line fishing.

Generalised linear models (GLM) and generalised mixed-effects models were used to estimate the influence of zoning on the maximum number of fish observed by each BRUVS (MaxN) for specific components of the fish community, showing that zoning had a significant effect on the observed MaxN, but this was detectable mainly in habitats dominated by corals. MaxN for aggregated groups of species taken as bycatch were similar in both 'blue' and 'green' zones, but the 'target' group MaxN was higher around green reefs in coral dominated habitats. In this habitat type, 'target' species were about 1.5 times, and unfished species about 1.9 times, as abundant in the 'green' zones as the same groups in the 'blue' zones.

Individual species showed distinct reponses, with grey reef sharks (taken as bycatch) having higher MaxN in a range of habitat types on green reefs, and the Venus tuskfish having lower MaxN on green reefs. The prized deep-water coral trout, red emperor and red-throat emperor had higher MaxN values around the green reefs in coral dominated habitats, but not by large margins. For every ten BRUVS sets, there were about eleven coral trout, six red emperor and five grey reef sharks more in green zones than in similar coral dominated habitats of blue zones.

We lacked any data on spatial and temporal variation in fishing effort in the deep habitats around reef bases, and for this reason our results should not be extrapolated regionally or throughout the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (GBRMP). It is plausible that fishing around the deep reef bases in these remote southern reefs occurs (if at all) at such a low level that the Representative Areas Program (RAP) 2004 zoning has had little effect on local fish abundance in areas already under little to no fishing pressure.

It is also possible that the deep, complex habitats around the reef bases extended continuously between reefs within some pairs, allowing fish unrestricted passage across zone boundaries. Our sampling was the first exploration of these habitats, and we could not stratify sampling by habitat type or extent. These results are in contrast to previous surveys of the discrete tops and slopes of the same reefs that have detected major impacts of the zoning plan on shallow-water coral trout, which comprise the major target of the long-range commercial fishery for the 'live reef fish' trade.

cappo_1

All Content © Reef & Rainforest Research Centre 2006